An
author writes a novel to tell a story but it's the people
in the novel that must make the story happen. For example, if a theft is going to take place, one of
the characters must be the thief. Most novels have two or three basic
characters and perhaps half a dozen secondary ones. So the
author must
bring into existence thieves and murderers, nuns and adulterers,
post-office clerks or bank managers to
breathe life into his story. Notice I said “bring into existence”
and not “create”. The difference is subtle, but it's what
separates the great works of literature from the trash that
eventually finds its way to the recycle bin.
Good
authors don't create characters. They observe them in every day life
and copy them. How else could it be? How would they know how thieves
behave and interact with others if they haven't met any? If they
created a thief and gave him characteristics that they think a thief
should have, readers who have met actual
thieves in their lives would not believe in him. Sooner or later word
would get around and the book would be forgotten. Authors write
fiction but we can only enjoy the story if we feel that the
characters are real, if we can believe in them. And if the author has
not copied his characters from life but created them, he might as
well send them to Mars!
Now
reader you probably think that I am putting you on. Isn't everyone
saying that authors “create” characters? I mean the first thing
we read in any novel, usually under the copyright statement, is that
the characters are the product of the author's imagination and that
they bear no relation to any living persons. Right? Hogwash!
No
major work of fiction and no respectable author can
exist unless their characters have been copied from real life.
Aunt Jemima might be aunt Margaret in the story, but if we are to
think that aunt Margaret is real, then it's a good idea that she
resembles aunt Jemima as much as possible. Of course she
doesn't have to be an exact copy. An author might change some of her
characteristics. He might have her knit instead of sew or give her
blue eyes instead of brown if that is necessary to the story. Still,
he must be very careful. He can't for instance have her solve
crossword puzzles then show her to have a limited vocabulary. There
are millions of such traps to fall into and the more an author
ventures off his real life model, the easier it becomes for him to
make a slip and make his character unbelievable.
But
what if the author needs an aunt Jemima for his story but hasn't met
one? In this case there are two things he must not
do: First, in no way can this
aunt Jemima be a major character. Major characters are so well
woven into the story that the reader becomes intimate with them and
unless they are real to a large extent, the author will be exposed.
Second, the author must never copy aunt Jemima from another novel. If
he does, then his book will have a photocopy of a photocopy, and we
all know how clear those are. What can he actually
do though?
In
my latest novel Bird
of Prey
(2010) for example, a secondary character who was an ancient coin
forger was absolutely necessary to the plot. I had never met such a
person so I set this as one of my priorities. Through various
contacts I actually managed to find one and we met in his shop. I
talked to him for five minutes. I had a good idea of his appearance
and actually saw his shop but I didn't manage to persuade him to see
me again. So for all practical purposes, I knew nothing about him.
What motivated him to forge ancient coins for example? Just money?
What about the risks he took? It would have been nice if I knew
someone who knew him intimately, but such men hide their profession
even from their wives so what could I do?
The
best course of action is psychological research articles, but there
are shortcuts. In
my
case The
Writer's Guide to Character Traits
by Linda Edelstein came to my rescue. Ms Edelstein has analyzed the
available psychological research of most professions, personality
types and
criminal
activities to give us a peek into what various
people are like and what makes them tick. In my case, when I
looked-up forger of Art,
I found that:
-Rarely
women
-Respectable,
may run a reputable business in restoration
-Almost
a creative artist, good technical ability
-Draws
inspiration from others' work, based on someone else's technique
-Justification
is “If I can paint a picture that people buy as a Monet, I must be
as good as the original”
-Buyers,
dealers, and experts do not like to believe they can be duped
-Success
folsters self esteem
-May
be a one-time event or a career
-Financial
gain may be secondary to creating a sensational object
-Amateurs
are motivated by envy, jealousy, inferiority, and desire for
attention
These
guidelines were enough for me to understand my character's motive and
construct his dialogues. At the end I became so convincing
that most of my readers found this character one of the better
secondary characters in the book. Still, there was no way I could
stretch him into a major character
without getting into trouble. How would he, for instance, interact
with other characters? What would his life be like beyond his
profession? Are such men timid or vulgar? Or doesn't it matter?
That's
why the major characters in any novel must be
based on people the author knows intimately. They can
be no less than his lovers, his boss
or his best friends. And because he exposes their pitfalls
to anyone who can read, they conceivably might get mad, stop talking
to him or even sue.
So
at the end, the author must hide behind his thumb and claim that they
are the products of his imagination!
I remember an antique seller who was suppose to be a coin forger in a Greek TV serial (Περί Ανέμων και Υδάτων).
ReplyDeleteI find your points interesting and illustrative. I will keep them in mind if I ever need them!
Angeliki