He
(Rhett Butler) swung
her (Scarlett O'Hara)
off her feet and into his arms and started up the stairs. Her head
was crushed against his chest and she heard the hard hammering of his
heart beneath her ears. He hurt her and she cried out, muffled,
frightened. Up the stairs he went in the utter darkness, up, up, and
she was wild with fear. He was a mad stranger and this was a black
darkness she did not know, darker than death...
They
say that these two paragraphs in Margaret Mitchell's Gone
With the Wind are
arguably the most famous sex scene in English (language) literature.
Simple words are used and there are no explicit or anatomical
details. A sure sign of sophistication, most critics or editors have
argued.
Reader
I have a confession to make. When I first read this scene I got more
anxious than aroused. Was there something wrong with me? Was I a
latent homosexual taken out of the closet by Margaret Mitchell's
sophisticated language? Had I wasted my valuable adolescent allowance
buying Playboy
when I should have bought sophisticated literature? I tried to
control my breathing and reread the two famous paragraphs. And then I
knew what was wrong.
Maybe I could lift Scarlett O'Hara. By a stretch of my imagination I could maybe swing her off her feet. I could perhaps even take her up a few steps. But then my imagination would exhaust itself and I would tumble down, down the stairs, wild with fear. And the only darkness I would see would come when Scarlett O'Hara lands on top of me and I would pass out!
Maybe I could lift Scarlett O'Hara. By a stretch of my imagination I could maybe swing her off her feet. I could perhaps even take her up a few steps. But then my imagination would exhaust itself and I would tumble down, down the stairs, wild with fear. And the only darkness I would see would come when Scarlett O'Hara lands on top of me and I would pass out!
I
cannot say that the scene doesn't work. Clearly it worked for
Margaret Mitchell. She wanted a real man to take her up a flight of
stairs, crush her against his chest, and make fierce love to her in a
dark room. The scene also works for most women. I am not sure though
that it works for men.
You
see, although a man and a woman may end-up in bed together,
the mechanism that gets each of them there is not
the same. To arouse a man, all a woman has to do is pass in front of
him. A glimpse of a pretty face, a half naked leg or even a
whispering voice for less than a minute is all it takes. It is no
accident that Hugh Hefner made his billions by selling colour photos
of the female form. And it is no accident that most women spend all
their money and half their lifetime buying clothes or in front of a
make-up mirror. They understand how the male arousal mechanism works
and want to take advantage of it.
Women
do not take the same path. Sure, they talk about a man's muscles,
glimpse at his ass and observe his shoes but their attention is
focused more on a man's qualities rather than his looks. To arouse a
woman, a man must help her transcend the path from fearing him to
feeling secure when his arm goes over her shoulder. Once a woman
crosses this ridge, from fear into security, she may be aroused. If
you read carefully Mitchell's two paragraphs beginning with the
phrase I have quoted above, you will note that that's exactly what
this passage evokes: fear replaced by security. It is no accident
then that this passage is famous and that it works so well—on
women. And what makes it work is not sophistication, as the critics
claim, but the nuts and bolts of the female arousal mechanism.
Inevitably,
the ultimate sex scene for men would have to be different. To match
the male arousal mechanism it must have explicit anatomical, and
perhaps even sexual details to replace the images a man needs. Still,
it would be nowhere near as fast nor as effective as a single image
may be. It is no surprise that all forms of pornography work so well
on men, nor that it is a multi-billion dollar industry, nor that it
makes up 50-80% of all Internet data transferred. You may say that it
is vulgar, that it lacks sophistication, but that's how the male
arousal mechanism works and there is not much we can do about it.
What
is ultimately surprising is that the Margaret Mitchell scene still
works on today's women. A hundred years ago, a farmer like Rhett
Butler could sweep Scarlett O'Hara off her feet and carry her up a
flight of steps. In this day and age, where male muscles have been
weakened by cars, couches and TV controls (and women are overweight)
Rhett Butler would really have to be a furniture mover.
Now,
dear critics and editors, how sophisticated
is that?
No comments:
Post a Comment